Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 23:58
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
NYC’s Noisy Skies Get Electric With Beta’s Demo Flight Into JFK - Bloomberg.com
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Despite practicing at CB and WR, Bo Melton won’t compare himself to Travis Hunter - NBC Sports
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Thank you.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What is one fantasy you have never told anyone about but really want to do?
Just in the last 5 years:
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Hegseth warns China poses 'imminent' threat to Taiwan and urges Asia to boost defence - BBC
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
How can I copy and paste the AI answers here on Quora since I can't do it anymore?
What’s next?
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What are some innovative business ideas for leveraging AI in 2024?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
The Biggest Pokémon Card Crashers And Climbers This Week - June 2 - IGN